McCanns: A penny for your thoughts

McCanns: A penny for your thoughts

Tort law is a body of law that addresses, and provides remedies for, civil wrongs not arising out of contractual obligations“.

It goes onto say: “A person who suffers legal damages may be able to use tort law to receive compensation from someone who is legally responsible, or liable, for those injuries”.

A person needs to show a judge that he/she has personally suffered a loss to bring an action into court. Sometimes a judge may only award nominal damages to the claimant, for example, one penny. By the same token, legal damage suffered can be as little as one penny.

The plan is this. I intend to donate the sum of one penny to the ‘Madeleine’s Fund : Leaving No Stone Unturned’. Then I can claim that I have legitimately suffered by the McCanns fraud, and take the matter into court.

In simple terms, fraud occurs when somebody makes a misrepresentation of material fact, in order to obtain action or forebearance by another person, where the other person relies upon the misrepresentation and suffers injury as a result of the act or forebearance taken in reliance upon the misrepresentation. In most fraud cases, there is active misrepresentation by the defendant. In some, the misrepresentation occurs through the defendant’s silence on a key issue”.

“A material fact is a fact which, if known, would have affected the judgment of one or more of the parties to a transaction. In an action for fraud, a material fact must be of sufficient importance to the matter that a reasonable person would have been likely to rely on it. A material fact cannot be an opinion, belief, prediction, or speculation, and typically must relate to something in the past or present that can be proved or disproved”.

“Within the context of fraud, reliance means that plaintiff would not have taken the particular action which underlies the fraud action (e.g., would not have entered into a contract with the defendant), had the defendant had not made the representation, promise or created the false impression, even if the representation, promise, or false impression was not the only reason for plaintiff’s action”.

“To establish fraud, a plaintiff typically has the burden of proving each of the following elements:

*

The defendant made a representation of one or more material facts;
*

The representation was false when it was made;
*

The defendant knew the representation was false when the defendant made it, or defendant made it recklessly (i.e., without knowing whether or not it was true);
*

The defendant made the representation with the intention that the plaintiff rely upon it;
*

The plaintiff relied upon the representation; and
*

The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the reliance“.

This is an interesting bit of info…

[i]t would…be a grave lacuna in our system of public law if a pressure group…or even a single public sprited taxpayer, were prevented by outdated technical rules of locus standi from bringing the matter to the attention of the court to vindicate the rule of law and get the unlawful conduct stopped.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

6 Responses to “McCanns: A penny for your thoughts”

  1. honestbroker Says:

    The next person to be sued for fraud will be the first …

  2. IRONSIDE Says:

    http://clarencemitchell.webs.com/

    I gave to the fund and yes I am livid to see the misuse of money. But then my fault as Aunt Phil said ,I should have read the small print. I wrote to Esther McCvey about the 80,000 she claimed was used in Spain for a Campaign, there was never a campaign in Spain….I did not hear from her. She knows something of that I am sure ,or suspects is maybe a better word.

  3. augusto santos Says:

    CONVICTIONS

    Decision to file the case Madeleine:
    (signed by two Prosecutors)

    “It was not achieved any evidence that allows an average man,
    according to the criteria of logic, and the normality and rules of experience,
    make any conclusion lucid, sensible, serious and honest
    about the circumstances which saw the removal of the child
    the apartment, nor spell, even,
    a prediction consistent ”

    The low content of evidence allegedly exists in
    process is inconsistent in any
    CRIMINAL SYSTEM CIVILIZED …

    Nor was evidence that Maddie was in the apartment …
    There are no certainties, only CONVICTIONS
    according to the culture of every thinking:

    CONVICTION atheist that is buried in the Church

    CONVICTION child that fell from the window and died

    CONVICTION clinic that she was drugged and died

    CONVICTION dog that was dead and buried

    CONVICTION statistics where Maddie was abducted

    CONVICTION legal that the withdrawal of the site of the Vatican
    is a matter of international law

    CONVICTION legal ignorant that abandoned children …

    CONVICTION “trauliteira” that there was abuse because the child cried

    CONVICTION pseudo-scientific evidence that the DNA is of Maddie

    CONVICTION stupid that the dog barked saying that the smell was of Maddie

    CONVICTION judicial who never tells the truth

    CONVICTION religious belief (primary) is dead, peace to your soul …

    CONVICTION religious belief (with theism) pray in the hope of being alive …

    CONVICTION civilized
    reflecting a deep respect for
    constitutional principle of presumption of innocence
    and the principle of “in dubio pro reo,”

    THAT THE McCANNS ARE INNOCENT

  4. llaaeell Says:

    Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral
    CURRICULUM VITAE

    GONÇALO AMARAL wandered the various engineering, but ended the night his degree in LAW.

    Gonçalo Amaral was employed in the Judiciary Police.

    Gonçalo Amaral coordinated the cases and JOANA and MADDIE
    both (finally?) missing.

    Crime of torture of Leonor, the mother of JOANA,
    Gonçalo Amaral was sentenced to prison, in which
    sentence reads: “particularly serious in people who have aim to combat the crime”

    Anticipated retirement to avoid
    disciplinary punishment. However, disciplinary procedure hangs , despite being retired .

    Also on the wrong track, Gonçalo Amaral, this
    No. 153849185 taxpayer to escape his IRS
    of the high yields of books and the like
    activities, created a Gonçalo Amaral-Unipessoal,
    Ltd., No. 508737729 contributor with one share and its sole object of criminal legal advice –
    that it causes a statutes null involving him in responsible unlimited ! Still, also results in fiscal transparency, so
    profits will be taxed will not in IRC but yes in
    IRS on pertaining to the value of reform, to say
    not to mention the possible confusion that must have
    in the settlement of VAT!

    Gonçalo Amaral was “incompetent”, or in the case
    JOANA or where Madeleine (Maddie).
    http://pravdailheu.blogs.sapo.pt/2009/07/?page=2
    = The Handling of the Spirits – Dr. Barra da Costa
    (blog Dr. Marcos Aragão Correia)
    vd. “Maddie, Jane and Criminal Investigation” —
    Dr. Barra da Costa, Publisher Books d ‘Today .–

    Thus, Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the case Maddie

    About this Gonçalo Amaral, the Foreign Press circulated the most shameful adjectives that in
    all attended the Judicial Police.
    http://newsoutlines.blogspot.com/2010/01/adjectives-used-by-british-press-to.html

    Gonçalo Amaral also reeks of frustration, shame and revenge along with an illegal / dishonest
    enrichment ( “non omne quod licet honesturn est)

    How much as the Portuguese would pay (your income tax …) in
    compensation to the McCanns, if the crazy “thesis” of
    Gonçalo Amaral was on?
    These “thesis” has no legal support. Children and ridiculous
    and a shameful but understandable (!) immoderate desire for wealth! … Need, as
    thanks …

    Hanging procedures against Gonçalo Amaral by crime of
    breach of secrecy of justice and falsification of documents

    Gonçalo Amaral was known to have problems
    financial severe and family in the second marriage.

    Only an idiot could imagine that a Prime Minister (Portuguese or English) to give an undertaking
    public with an alleged criminal! … Neither
    is nothing objectionable friendship Gordon Brown and
    the McCanns.

    The book “True Lies” (AVM) is defamatory.
    Your right to free expression ends where
    begins my right to good name and reputation
    the image and the privacy private and family
    (Article 26 and 37, both the Constitution of the Republic
    Portuguese and Article 10 of the ECHR, also, the Jurisprudence of the STJ is the effect that the disclosure
    a fact, even if true, can be considered to be defamatory).

    AVM book contains facts of the case Maddie already
    is not in secrecy. However, the book AVM ,
    which was published and sold or offered to the public ,
    can not contain those facts which may be con –
    sidered defamatory, aggravated by reason of not
    are officially tested by the com –
    petents authorities .
    For example, even in a case where it has been proven
    that A stole B, B can not come into the public
    the scream that is a thief or publish such fact in
    lampoons kiosk.

    In stupid obsession to prove that the book AVM
    had the facts of the case, it envisioned that opened
    proof for the crime of breach of confidentiality of justice
    without prejudice to the crime of defamation .

    The prosecution McCanns against the Gonçalo
    Amaral, are correct and are supported constitutional
    tional and legal laws .

    The closing of the case Maddie was done with a
    Order signed by two magistrates, which reads:
    “It was not achieved any evidence that
    allows an average man, according to the criteria of
    logic, normality and rules of experience,
    make any conclusion lucid, sensible, serious and
    honest about the circumstances in which there was a
    removing the child from the apartment, nor spell,
    even, a prediction consistent.

    Gonçalo Amaral is not an ‘average’ man, logical and
    normal, and it is experience lucid, sensible, serious and
    honest?

    “Errare humanum est”. Dogs? not?
    Assuming the dogs do not err, however,
    (to the second owner of the dogs …) the smell of the dogs is not an evidence (blood, smell the man dead?
    or the woman dead? ). It seems that the dog did not say it was
    Maddie! (Castigat ridendo mores “).

    The endless wishing to enter the apartment
    Ocean Club, become sterile or innocuous discussions
    the window open / close … especially in an apartment
    ment initial and admittedly contaminated.

    Forgive yourself (in casu “) the” black humor ”
    that there have been one enlightened was discovered
    hidden the body in the key of the Church …
    The hypocrisy is the limit
    suggested that the parents abused by Maddie
    have heard Maddie crying when the videos,
    either in England or in Praia da Luz, reveal a
    normal relationship between parents and child.

    Partial DNA is irrelevant in terms of criminal
    in the case of in vitro fertilization, science
    Gonçalo Amaral shows ignore.

    The argument of the English habit of “doping”
    to sleep, do not have here a logical framework
    time.

    There is nothing objectionable to do everything a father (right
    or wrong) to find a daughter, in particular
    notify Sky News shortly before the call the Ocean Club to inept GNR who warned that P.J.
    that appeared 4 hours after the disappearance : Gonçalo
    Amaral who like nothing found, apologized to
    an apartment with a view of the research was all
    contaminated. However, did not hesitate to pos –
    terior imagine a successful fiction media.

    Removal of the site Maddie on TV of the Vatican only has basis in law Interna –
    tional (non-interference in internal affairs of the Portuguese).

    For those who know the legal environment, it is known
    should not be conclusive contradictions find
    in the different actors, without exception,
    in particular Gonçalo Amaral …

    For malicious and less-informed
    no have crime of abandonment p. and p. Article
    138 of the Penal Code. Madeleine has not been aban –
    doned in any garden. Was kept in
    privately owned and closely monitored. For
    reputed Merck Manual, abandonment means the lack of
    food, clothing and care. For the Court
    At Oporto, “abandoned” at home and the street, with father in prison and mother a street vendor, not
    is abandoned or no reason for depriving them

    Gonçalo Amaral and his faithful friend Moita Flores, permanently
    violated the secrecy of justice and defaming
    the McCanns, said with no evidence, that
    Maddie is dead and the McCanns was committed the crime of a hiding corpse and it provoked a very negative perception of the case thought of Portuguese people and abroad , already
    called “The Manipulation of the Spirits” .

    An innocent question to Gonçalo Amaral:
    Proved that Maddie was in the apartment?
    If YES, nothing has proven useful and concrete. Never.
    If NO, with the Respect(?) , “the goal mouth in the
    Trombone “and walk to deceive” parole “.

    In the century of globalization, the case Maddie came
    the secular rise complex and stupid allergy
    English (in recent political intrigues, now also found in relation to the Spanish …).

    In the most probable abduction (only in 2009,
    children disappeared in 1100-DN-Filipa Ambrose of
    Sousa) have meditated cruelty that was made to McCanns by the “fuzzy” and vindictive Gonçalo Amaral?

    And if you?

    What do you think about this Gonçalo Amaral?

    After all, WHO is Gonçalo Amaral?
    (a question multi-disciplinary)

    With positive thinks

    HELP U.S. FIND
    MADELEINE
    GRATEFUL

  5. llaaeell Says:

    GONÇALO AMARAL wandered the various engineering, but ended the night his degree in LAW.

    Gonçalo Amaral was employed in the Judiciary Police.

    Gonçalo Amaral coordinated the cases and JOANA and MADDIE
    both (finally?) missing.

    Crime of torture of Leonor, the mother of JOANA,
    Gonçalo Amaral was sentenced to prison, in which
    sentence reads: “particularly serious in people who have aim to combat the crime”

    Anticipated retirement to avoid
    disciplinary punishment. However, disciplinary procedure hangs , despite being retired .

    Also on the wrong track, Gonçalo Amaral, this
    No. 153849185 taxpayer to escape his IRS
    of the high yields of books and the like
    activities, created a Gonçalo Amaral-Unipessoal,
    Ltd., No. 508737729 contributor with one share and its sole object of criminal legal advice –
    that it causes a statutes null involving him in responsible unlimited ! Still, also results in fiscal transparency, so
    profits will be taxed will not in IRC but yes in
    IRS on pertaining to the value of reform, to say
    not to mention the possible confusion that must have
    in the settlement of VAT!

    Gonçalo Amaral was “incompetent”, or in the case
    JOANA or where Madeleine (Maddie).
    http://pravdailheu.blogs.sapo.pt/2009/07/?page=2
    = The Handling of the Spirits – Dr. Barra da Costa
    (blog Dr. Marcos Aragão Correia)
    vd. “Maddie, Jane and Criminal Investigation” —
    Dr. Barra da Costa, Publisher Books d ‘Today .–

    Thus, Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the case Maddie

    About this Gonçalo Amaral, the Foreign Press circulated the most shameful adjectives that in
    all attended the Judicial Police.
    http://newsoutlines.blogspot.com/2010/01/adjectives-used-by-british-press-to.html

    Gonçalo Amaral also reeks of frustration, shame and revenge along with an illegal / dishonest
    enrichment ( “non omne quod licet honesturn est)

    How much as the Portuguese would pay (your income tax …) in
    compensation to the McCanns, if the crazy “thesis” of
    Gonçalo Amaral was on?
    These “thesis” has no legal support. Children and ridiculous
    and a shameful but understandable (!) immoderate desire for wealth! … Need, as
    thanks …

    Hanging procedures against Gonçalo Amaral by crime of
    breach of secrecy of justice and falsification of documents

    Gonçalo Amaral was known to have problems
    financial severe and family in the second marriage.

    Only an idiot could imagine that a Prime Minister (Portuguese or English) to give an undertaking
    public with an alleged criminal! … Neither
    is nothing objectionable friendship Gordon Brown and
    the McCanns.

    The book “True Lies” (AVM) is defamatory.
    Your right to free expression ends where
    begins my right to good name and reputation
    the image and the privacy private and family
    (Article 26 and 37, both the Constitution of the Republic
    Portuguese and Article 10 of the ECHR, also, the Jurisprudence of the STJ is the effect that the disclosure
    a fact, even if true, can be considered to be defamatory).

    AVM book contains facts of the case Maddie already
    is not in secrecy. However, the book AVM ,
    which was published and sold or offered to the public ,
    can not contain those facts which may be con –
    sidered defamatory, aggravated by reason of not
    are officially tested by the com –
    petents authorities .
    For example, even in a case where it has been proven
    that A stole B, B can not come into the public
    the scream that is a thief or publish such fact in
    lampoons kiosk.

    In stupid obsession to prove that the book AVM
    had the facts of the case, it envisioned that opened
    proof for the crime of breach of confidentiality of justice
    without prejudice to the crime of defamation .

    The prosecution McCanns against the Gonçalo
    Amaral, are correct and are supported constitutional
    tional and legal laws .

    The closing of the case Maddie was done with a
    Order signed by two magistrates, which reads:
    “It was not achieved any evidence that
    allows an average man, according to the criteria of
    logic, normality and rules of experience,
    make any conclusion lucid, sensible, serious and
    honest about the circumstances in which there was a
    removing the child from the apartment, nor spell,
    even, a prediction consistent.

    Gonçalo Amaral is not an ‘average’ man, logical and
    normal, and it is experience lucid, sensible, serious and
    honest?

    “Errare humanum est”. Dogs? not?
    Assuming the dogs do not err, however,
    (to the second owner of the dogs …) the smell of the dogs is not an evidence (blood, smell the man dead?
    or the woman dead? ). It seems that the dog did not say it was
    Maddie! (Castigat ridendo mores “).

    The endless wishing to enter the apartment
    Ocean Club, become sterile or innocuous discussions
    the window open / close … especially in an apartment
    ment initial and admittedly contaminated.

    Forgive yourself (in casu “) the” black humor ”
    that there have been one enlightened was discovered
    hidden the body in the key of the Church …
    The hypocrisy is the limit
    suggested that the parents abused by Maddie
    have heard Maddie crying when the videos,
    either in England or in Praia da Luz, reveal a
    normal relationship between parents and child.

    Partial DNA is irrelevant in terms of criminal
    in the case of in vitro fertilization, science
    Gonçalo Amaral shows ignore.

    The argument of the English habit of “doping”
    to sleep, do not have here a logical framework
    time.

    There is nothing objectionable to do everything a father (right
    or wrong) to find a daughter, in particular
    notify Sky News shortly before the call the Ocean Club to inept GNR who warned that P.J.
    that appeared 4 hours after the disappearance : Gonçalo
    Amaral who like nothing found, apologized to
    an apartment with a view of the research was all
    contaminated. However, did not hesitate to pos –
    terior imagine a successful fiction media.

    Removal of the site Maddie on TV of the Vatican only has basis in law Interna –
    tional (non-interference in internal affairs of the Portuguese).

    For those who know the legal environment, it is known
    should not be conclusive contradictions find
    in the different actors, without exception,
    in particular Gonçalo Amaral …

    For malicious and less-informed
    no have crime of abandonment p. and p. Article
    138 of the Penal Code. Madeleine has not been aban –
    doned in any garden. Was kept in
    privately owned and closely monitored. For
    reputed Merck Manual, abandonment means the lack of
    food, clothing and care. For the Court
    At Oporto, “abandoned” at home and the street, with father in prison and mother a street vendor, not
    is abandoned or no reason for depriving them

    Gonçalo Amaral and his faithful friend Moita Flores, permanently
    violated the secrecy of justice and defaming
    the McCanns, said with no evidence, that
    Maddie is dead and the McCanns was committed the crime of a hiding corpse and it provoked a very negative perception of the case thought of Portuguese people and abroad , already
    called “The Manipulation of the Spirits” .

    An innocent question to Gonçalo Amaral:
    Proved that Maddie was in the apartment?
    If YES, nothing has proven useful and concrete. Never.
    If NO, with the Respect(?) , “the goal mouth in the
    Trombone “and walk to deceive” parole “.

    In the century of globalization, the case Maddie came
    the secular rise complex and stupid allergy
    English (in recent political intrigues, now also found in relation to the Spanish …).

    In the most probable abduction (only in 2009,
    children disappeared in 1100-DN-Filipa Ambrose of
    Sousa) have meditated cruelty that was made to McCanns by the “fuzzy” and vindictive Gonçalo Amaral?

    And if you?

    What do you think about this Gonçalo Amaral?

    After all, WHO is Gonçalo Amaral?
    (a question multi-disciplinary)

    With positive thinks

    HELP U.S. FIND
    MADELEINE
    GRATEFUL

  6. augusto santos Says:

    THE TRUTH OF LIE GONÇALIANA

    The book “True Lies”
    boils down to their last two pages:
    Do not buy the book True Lies.
    All you have to photocopy the pages 220 and 221

    — page 220 —
    1. accused (without proof) the practice by the McCanns crime
    simulation of abduction (p. crime and p. Article 366 PC)
    This is not DEFAMATORY?
    2. denied the testimony of Jane Tanner on the assumption
    abduction! Not annulled nor proven …
    3. Notes contradictions in the statements, analysis
    between actors, which “per se” is irrelevant “in casu”.
    Who knows the legal means, you know that this is normal …
    And pathetically says this is a crime of perjury p. and p. in Ar –
    360 mg of C.P..
    This is not DEFAMATORY?
    4. Given the assumptions INFINITAS input (= output) in
    apartment 5A at the Ocean Club, the obsession of the open window or closed or the inability to go there, show the continued child/man
    of the same investigator who condemned Leonora’s mother Joan,quartered and hidden in a tiny refrigerator where it was not!
    5. “There is a body not found” (sic),
    – “Finding validated by dogs and englishmen EVRD CSI” (sic)
    – “And supported by preliminary laboratory results” (sic)
    The very distinctive “witch” (?) Goncalo Amaral,
    found (#) that had not found a corpse (!)
    (#) Maybe dream of the nightmare of the his torture of Leonor …
    and then also found this fact with the English dogs!
    (Gonçalo Amaral is “ad minus” intellectually dishonest “)
    However, the actual owner of the dogs, Martin Grime, in TV interview
    and to set the process itself (Volume IX), the dogs prove nothing,
    only give clues (right or wrong) that have to be confirmed
    scientifically, what did not happen). Look what we got when
    Lusitanian idiots up some believed that the dog barked saying
    the smell of dead was the Madeleine!

    — page 221 — (5 points)
    “1. The lower Madeleine McCann died in apartment 5A at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz on the night of 3 May 2007; ”
    Only is no evidence that she is dead, much less
    with the detail “on the night of May 3, 2007, and much less
    death was in the apartment 5th at the Ocean Club!
    And because the detective Goncalo Amaral has not established until she was in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club!

    “2. There was a simulation of abduction, ”
    This is not DEFAMATORY? least because crime is not proven …

    “3. Kate Healy and Gerald McCann are suspected of involvement in hiding the corpse of his daughter; ”
    what is crime p. and p. Article 254º of the C.P..
    This is not DEFAMATORY? least because crime is not proven …

    “4. The death may have come upon a result of a tragic accident; ”
    IRRATIONAL (= ridiculous):
    Accident? (what?) + Death? (defense, Homicide shivers …) – without proof + crime simulation of abduction
    + Crime of concealment of a body (where?)
    The very distinguished detective know the who? which? why? the where? the like? and the when?

    It smells of delinquency on the loose …
    “5. There is no evidence of negligence in the care and safety in the the children ”

    This only deals with “pepper swindler” for those who have nothing to say …
    For the reputed MERCK Manual, abandonment means
    lack of food, clothing and care. There is also no drop in any
    son of father caught and mother a street vendor, with the child alone
    street and at home, nor is there reason to withdraw the child, this second
    case of the Oporto Court

    And it’s the intellectual dishonesty of Gonçalo Amaral and / or its frustration at being removed for his “shameful and indecent bad picture” that leads him to have missed the book in order to prosecute
    given as “was not obtained any evidence that allows
    an average man, according to the criteria of logic, and the normality , and rules of experience, to formulate any conclusion lucid, sensible, serious and honest about the circumstances which saw the withdrawal of children from the apartment, nor spell, even a prognosis consistent. Order of file signed by two Judges .
    Gonçalo Amaral is not a middle man? It is neither logical or normal? His experience reflects neither lucidity and wisdom or
    seriousness and honesty?
    Even in the sentence that condemns him to prison for the crime of torture of Leonora, reads: “particularly serious in people who have to fight the crime.”
    Only one “crazy” can synthesize “accident” + “death” + “hiding corpse”
    +” simulation of abduction”!

    The book THE TRUTH OF THE LIE
    is an insult to the intelligence of those who have …
    and a compliment to
    who takes advantage of it …

    Gonçalo Amaral has pending criminal charges of forgery and criminal charges of breach of secrecy justice and crime of torture John Cipriano , brother of Leonora .
    Still, with the disciplinary procedure!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: