Comments for Justice For Madeleine

Comment on Tapas 7 receive libel damages even though they lied by IRONSIDE

IRONSIDE — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:52:44 +0000

What a bunch of slimy crooks they look.

Comment on McCanns taped admission unlawfully obtained by IRONSIDE

IRONSIDE — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:49:23 +0000

Amaral has also hinted something about the blanket…always a mystery why Tanner said she saw the abductor with it and then did a complete change around…Kate slipped up with a comment about the pink blanket Amaral knows and kate knows he knows…at the moment we are in the dark….Blanket coverage maybe?

Comment on Should Kate McCann be Woman of the Year 2008? by IRONSIDE

IRONSIDE — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:42:46 +0000

Kates mental state needs looking into and quick…As we are now 2009 we were lucky to have missed that choice. Mccann for a knighthood however would not surprise me in the future.

Comment on Why the McCanns are fraudsters by IRONSIDE

IRONSIDE — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:26:02 +0000

These posts I see are all from 2008. we are now in 2009 maddie has been missing for more than two years, many things have happened but one thing that has not changed is the mccanns they are still out with the begging bowl and have a new product for sale in the Maddie shop…A vest showing maddie with her photo aged three years….plus a “travel pack” The vest is 7.00 best quality cotton washes up well time and time again, just like cuddle cat. The travel pack? price unknown or its content to date. A sure way to help us all keep busy this summer chasing the mccanns circus.

IRONSIDE

Comment on McCanns involved in Madeleine Fund fraud by IRONSIDE

IRONSIDE — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:17:27 +0000

This has been going on for more than two years John and to be honest I am none the wiser what exactly is the game the Mccanns are playing. Do not forget to look out for your “Travel Pack” coming soon to the Maddie shop.

Comment on A very plausible case against the McCanns by Glenn

Glenn — Tue, 19 May 2009 17:25:34 +0000

There’s something that niggles and bugs the life out of me. It’s the bloodstains found behind the sofa by two separate sniffer dogs. In his video, the Portuguese detective says there was evidence the area behind the sofa had been washed (where the dogs found miniscule blood stains). Yes, I fully understand the counter argument that this cleaning could have been done at an earlier date by a previous resident at the apartment, however implausible it sounds.

However, but, and … the niggle and doubts persist. The evidence does seem to suggest that Madeleine McCann died in that apartment on the very night she was allegedly abducted. So why the bloodstains? Does that not suggest a violent death; a child thrown hard against something or hit hard enough to cause her death? Does accidental drowning in a bath tub or an overdose cause bleeding? I don’t know the answer to that one.

The Portuguese police themselves came up with a possible theory that Madeleine may have fallen from the sofa, and died as a result of her injuries. Or was that just an opening in the hope that the McCann’s would come forward and speak?

The strange thing is, if Madeleine McCann had indeed fallen, injured herself and died alone while her parents were out being middle-class socialites, why was it necessary for them to invent such an elaborate fairy tale? They could have said their daughter fell off the sofa and died as a result of her injuries. Nobody would have known they were at the Tapas bar; nobody would have disbelieved their story. Nobody would have known any different. Heck, they could have even waited until the next morning when they were sober.

Unless of course, Madeleine died as a result of an extreme act of violence, and being medical professionals, the parents knew that any subsequent medical examination of Madeleine’s body would paint a very different picture indeed.

On a personal level I am disinclined to believe that Madeleine McCann died accidentally. I believe that she may have been flung against the floor or wall, or struck hard enough to kill her. I don’t see any evidence that the so called Tapas Seven were in anyway involved in the disposal of her body. I believe their involvement stopped with the tissue of lies and deceit they spun to protect their McCann friends during the police investigation.

Comment on McCanns: Reasonable suspicion? by Inkalilly

Inkalilly — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:46:08 +0000

I truly believe in life if you want answers you need to ask the right questions!! In any enquiry if faced with some evidence, and the suspect tells you oh the reason is this or that…. you will check out this alibi. So Im just wondering on the evidence of cadaver odor found on Kates clothes and cuddlecat.. if I remeber correctly her answer to this was she dealt with cadavers just before holiday in same clothes. Ok all good, BUT did anyone check this out? I mean if its true well then one need to get to the following question and check that answer out. If she was indeed in contact as she said, then ok but if not??? Im sure this point can easily be either confirmed or denied by her Senior where she worked?

Comment on Brazilian child’s murder becomes news soap opera by How to Get Six Pack Fast

How to Get Six Pack Fast — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:00:19 +0000

My fellow on Orkut shared this link with me and I’m not dissapointed that I came to your blog.

Comment on McCanns: Just a thought by teachthemasses

teachthemasses — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:57:15 +0000

How true- but now they go to spin their spin in Chicago- ”the windy city that may blow some Oprah money their way.”

Comment on McCanns: Reasonable suspicion? by faithless

faithless — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:45:02 +0000

I think Jean Baker intended to write “In 92% of homicides of children in Madeleine’s age group, the caregivers are eventually determined to be the killers.”

In any case, whatever anybody’s theories are, it is not yet determined whether Madeleine has been killed. So the correct statistics to look at would be those of unexplained disappearance of 4 year old girls.