Comments on: Kate McCann killed Madeleine

By: hermione

hermione — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:22:46 +0000

I agree that they killed her and there is paedophillia involved. The dogs are never wrong, they have never made a false alert. Madeleine died in 5A and the parents attacked the dogs findings. Any innocent parent would have been devastated by the dogs alerts. Bring on justice for Madeleine.
I want them to face justice. They are sickeningly smug that they have got away with it.

By: kurt

kurt — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:40:15 +0000

Michelle….nicely put.

By: Michelle

Michelle — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:30:22 +0000

I am uncetain as to the guilt or innocence of the McCanns. I mean none of us, having not been present at the time of this event, KNOW for sure what has happened.
I have no problem with free speech and I celebrate everyone being able to discuss their theories and opinions openly.
What I take issue with is when someone says….Kate Killed Madeleine! Because until that can be proven in a court of law, it is still just speculation….
I think we do ourselves a huge disservice when we brand people as guilty , or not guilty, for that matter before all evidence has been reviewed, all possibilites exhausted, all witnesses interviewed, etc.
We can all discuss our theories. I have one myself.
And I tend to believe that the truth of what happened to Madeleine can be found within that circle of people at the Ocean Club. But that is just my opinion, my speculation, my guess if you will. I think that what I know supports my idea that a friend or family may be responsible….But none of us should be so irresponsible to say that we KNOW this or that!
Now having said that….IF someone has specific reasons for saying what they do…if they are privy to information concerning FACTS that make them 100% certain—then by all means share your facts with us that support your theory of guilt. Make us beleivers! IF you are unable to provide these details then what you believe remains just that—what YOU believe……..
….not a FACT!

just one ladies opnion….

By: Jean Baker

Jean Baker — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:10:18 +0000

John,

Police reports confirm they placed Murat under phone surveillance and found nothing untoward. Ditto examination of his computer. They must have obtained consent to do so.

An article in First Post stated intercepted e-mails and phone calls confirmed the McCanns were directly involved in Madeleine’s death and disappearance. It, therefore, seems likely that PJ put all suspects under surveillance, but Government intervention stopped findings being revealed, in or out of Court.

Police sourced findings have been swiftly dealt with from day one. Police Reports show all forensic ‘leaks’ were factually based. There were press reports of further evidence sent to FSS in December regarding fibres found on a towel – Aztec design – in a barn – undiclosed location tied to mobile phone surveillance; fibres on the towel reportedly matched fibres in cadaver boot specimens. I kept the article – DE wiped it from their records.

By: The growing army against the McCanns « Justice For Madeleine

The growing army against the McCanns « Justice For Madeleine — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:40:39 +0000

[...] was a shaky moment yesterday when an attempt to censor Kate McCann killed Madeleine was made by someone at wordpress. Obviously some supporter of child killing lodged a complaint and [...]

By: Engy Bengy

Engy Bengy — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:39:20 +0000

John Hirst,

I backed the mccanns 100% but now the more i read and think about it the more i am starting to think that you might be right, their stories don’t add up and being a parent myself and this happened to me i would be in bloody tears constantly i think they will have to lock me up in a nuthouse! The mccanns on the other hand don’t look too upset and more staged/acted. Gerry Mccann sucking on a lollipop in the pj police station while talking rugby and football with a english police officer, sorry but that kind of behaviour for a dad that just lost his daughter sounds a bit fishy to me. I am surprised that nothing is happening to them at all, a very interesting point most people make when talking about the mccanns is: If low income/parents on benefits did what the mccanns did to leave their children alone at night they’d be locked up and slated but NO not for the Mccanns they are rich and doctors and they are above the law! I like your comments and i agree people should be able to freely express their opinions!

I was hoping Madeleine would still be alive and one day returned through some miracle but it just doesn’t look like that will happen but the truth will come out, one day!

By: TMH

TMH — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:46:41 +0000

As a community of bloggers claiming journalistic status, you need to inquiry about the role of ethics in your practices. You may believe what you wish, but publishing without substantive proof is a practice that will lead you to civil court. As the McCanns and Robert Murat have both successfully sued wealthy media corporations for printing unsubstantiated claims of their involvement and guilt in the disappearance of Madeleine, I doubt that individuals using a public forum such as a blog will be able to marshall the resources required to defend themselves against the McCann’s legal team. Once they have dealt with the wealthiest offenders, I believe they will eat their way down the food chain as their need to finance the Maddie fund perseveres. Indeed, no stone will be left unturned and bloggers bemoaning the loss of their journalistic freedom will have an impossible task to use freedom of speech as a defence when democracies have been founded on the principle that freedom is never limitless; instead, it is balanced with an expectation that the freedom is used responsibly. Kuddos to bloggers that explore the possibilities without making accusations. There is a human tragedy here! A child, not quite 4-years of age, is unaccounted for and every day that she is missing whether she be dead or alive is a day that breaks the hearts of millions of people. So, a question to the author of this blog, how is your heart doing in light of so many dark possibilities?

By: Projektion

Projektion — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:31:07 +0000

JOHN HIRST – SHAME ON YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: John Hirst

John Hirst — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:45:09 +0000

hypernation: If you did your rational research, you would discover that I cannot be a troll on my own blog. You are obviously thinking of yourself and trying to project it upon me. It’s funny how I got the exclusive on Branson being a financial backer of the McCanns, and Clarence Mitchell tipping off the McCanns to electronic surveillance. Anything else?

By: hypernation

hypernation — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:10:31 +0000

You say you ’seek to question their version of events’ – would you consider doing this through rational research and evidence? Because whatever your screed above is, it is certainly not reached through the tried and tested method of ‘actually knowing something about something’

You are a troll.